Thursday, October 23, 2008

ThE StuPidiTy oF HuMan LiFe

Datukship to Shah Rukh Khan ???

What the h*** !! What was his contribution to the country until "they" decide to give him that title ??? All i know that, he only shot some film here. Did his action helps to increase the tourism economy of the country ?? maybe it helps to promote Malaysia to others but it just a coincidence. To be the primary factor that contribute to Malaysia economy, i would say totally NO!. Even standard six's students know that this is b***s***. Why dont they give Sean Connery and Catherine Zeta Jones the title too, they also hv done some filming here ??..Thousand of Malaysian have the right to that title, all "they" need to do is search for the right one.

No matter what "their" reason is, it still doesn't make any sense and this would give all Malaysian something to laughing at in a years to come.


Anonymous said...

beb, honestly speaking, I don't even agree with the use of the title 'datuk' or 'dato'. no matter who should receive it and what contributions did they give, 'datukship' is not relevant as far as i'm concern. if the reason of giving the title is because of someone's contribution, i think like half of the malaysian citizens should receive it. and as far as i know, here in the States, there's no title to be rewarded and those who have titles are the people who work real hard like professors and doctors.
what do you think?

-farah abdullah-

arEnA said...

that's right!! nothings wrong in giving the title away, maybe that is the way to appreciate what they do,as long as the receiver is MALAYSIAN, i hv no argument bout that, maybe they do sumthin that is valuable..but shah rukh khan ???..ONE HELL OF A JOKE!!

cHoco said...

ntah nape ntah bagi datukship kat SRK. kalo bagi kat pengarah ke or beliau yg mana memilih malaysia sebagai tempat shooting tu masuk akal la gak kan.... ape jadah... bukan malaysian je ada something to laugh at, we might be the laughing stock to